Everyone agrees that we need to be more innovative in our recommendations to clients to create greater impact. However, despite rightful intent and efforts, there seems to be great variation in the quality of outcomes. Some practitioners by experience or intellect are able to provide wider perspectives than majority. So what does the majority do besides blaming education, experience or IQ?
I believe that conscious and rigorous employing of seemingly contradicting perspectives on any context can help us widen the universal set of possibilities leading to potentially better advice. This is what we reckon as “being creative by design”.
Listed below are some of the perspectives (about objectives, strategy and execution) put forward by gurus that although contrarian to established thinking seems to be true as well in specific contexts.
1. Stakeholders get motivated differently
- What motivates a professional manager may not motivate the owner of the firm. Economists have always insisted on goal alignment between owners and professional managers under principal-agent theory. There is considerable debate on whether shareholder wealth maximization or stakeholder value generation should be the key objective functions of an enterprise.
- Further, managers and employees may get motivated differently. Even in the same group, individuals may stand at different levels on the Missionary- Mercenary Orientation Continuum.
- Off-course, there is need for an overarching objective that collectively reflects the aspirations of all stakeholders. But, for the message to engage, it should be able to connect to individual level legitimate aspirations as well.
Implications : Do not assume! Ascertain that every stakeholder’s priorities and expendables are well understood and the look towards achievement of Pareto Optimality.
2. Selective Strategic Views are standalone traps
- Strategy formulation is essentially a creative exercise, an art that is being continuously scientisized through different frameworks, each approach providing a specific view towards strategy formulation.
- Unconscious of single view limitations, consultants often pick specific approach (framework) as favorites and apply it in all situations limiting the options.
- Ansoff matrix provides a sufficient framework for us to explore both the competitive and innovation orientation, provided we do justice to all the quadrants. Return Driven Strategy framework is another broad encompassing framework.
Implications : It pays to consciously apply different views of Strategy Formulation to a situation to come up with diverse solution set.
No comments:
Post a Comment